Notice: Welcome to Chan4Chan. An account has automatically been created and assigned to you. You don't have to register or log in to use the board. Please don't clear your cookies unless you have set a memorable name and password.

Topic: 3D porn

Anonymous A started this discussion 3.9 years ago #2,473

why do you think there is so little 3D porn around?

I know it's more expensive and a bit of a hassle to shoot 3D but that can't be the only reason.

what do you fellow pervs think?

is 3D porn better or just a gimmick?

it certainly would make tranny porn more in your face than ever before...

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3.9 years ago, 29 minutes later#28,895

I'm color blind so the only 3D porn I see is in person. Which is the best.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3.9 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post#28,898

@previous

> I'm color blind so the only 3D porn I see is in person. Which is the best.

wait, what?

you realize that colourblindness has nothing to do with 3D.
unless you're one of those that can't see depth in the stereo images.
or do you refer to the old school coloured glasses 3D?
if so then try out the active or passive full colour 3D TVs

oh and just for the record the only 3D porn in person you see is if you watch yourself in the mirror while jerking off, remember, we're on c4c,the home of the basementdwelling virgins...

Anonymous B replied with this 3.9 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post#28,899

@previous

> > I'm color blind so the only 3D porn I see is in person. Which is the best.
>
> wait, what?
>
> you realize that colourblindness has nothing to do with 3D.
> unless you're one of those that can't see depth in the stereo images.
> or do you refer to the old school coloured glasses 3D?
> if so then try out the active or passive full colour 3D TVs
>
> oh and just for the record the only 3D porn in person you see is if you watch yourself in the mirror while jerking off, remember, we're on c4c,the home of the basementdwelling virgins...

Yes, I was referring to the old school 3D. I've also tried the newer 3D, which doesn't work for me either. I never heard of the depth in stereo images blindness you mentioned. I'll have to look into that.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3.9 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post#28,900

@previous

> > > I'm color blind so the only 3D porn I see is in person. Which is the best.
> >
> > wait, what?
> >
> > you realize that colourblindness has nothing to do with 3D.
> > unless you're one of those that can't see depth in the stereo images.
> > or do you refer to the old school coloured glasses 3D?
> > if so then try out the active or passive full colour 3D TVs
> >
> > oh and just for the record the only 3D porn in person you see is if you watch yourself in the mirror while jerking off, remember, we're on c4c,the home of the basementdwelling virgins...
>
> Yes, I was referring to the old school 3D. I've also tried the newer 3D, which doesn't work for me either. I never heard of the depth in stereo images blindness you mentioned. I'll have to look into that.

it's about 5-10% of the population.
some info that might help:
http://www.visiontherapy.ca/3dmediaandvision.html#sthash.lFyTjqW8.dpbs
http://www.visiontherapystories.org/depth_perception.html

may not apply to you though.
good luck.

I must say, I like 3D(not just for porn,especially since there barely is good one) but it is vital to have good 3D.
Make sure it is native(filmed with two cameras) and not a conversion(though there are really good ones now too) and it should have a high production budget so that most errors that are prone to happen while shooting were corrected in post.
most TVs have settings to increase the depth and / or shift the image back and forth in front and behind the screen.
make sure the images are not too far apart(you'll see it at the double edges) or you may get headaches.

Anonymous B replied with this 3.9 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post#28,901

Thanks for the links, those are pretty interesting.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3.9 years ago, 19 hours later, 1 day after the original post#28,921

@previous

> Thanks for the links, those are pretty interesting.

cheers.


but has nobody else an opinion on this?
maybe that's the reason why there is not much 3D porn around.
or maybe I should've asked about 3D porn of a turd in a bowl, strap-on porn or 3D CP (preferably with sasha grey - the hottest 'n filthiest in CP there is).
...maybe this board really is dead and I'm talking to myself...
no I don't.
shut up,you do.
don't touch my precious!
...

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3.9 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post#28,922

The thing with porn is that most people that watch it are antisocial losers. They like the idea that they're watching somebody else. Like voyeurism. 3D Porn makes it right there, and they don't get the fantasy of spying.

But that's just my opinion.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3.9 years ago, 57 minutes later, 1 day after the original post#28,923

@previous

> The thing with porn is that most people that watch it are antisocial losers.
I seriously doubt that, in fact I I go as far as to say that is the dishonest attempt at distancing yourself from the (childish and hypocritical )social taboo.
You can't seriously tell me you've never seen porn,unless you are one of those openly admitting to be a loser.

Porn is a multibillion dollar industry, there are probably thousands of petabytes of porn streamed over the net per day, viewed by hundreds of millions of users.

Your assumption would lead to the conclusion that our societies worldwide are largely populated by antisocial losers(this certainly is true to a degree,but not like this).

If you look at statistics of those visiting strip clubs or prostitutes you'll find that the clientele is spread throughout the social spectrum,same must be true about porn.

> They like the idea that they're watching somebody else. Like voyeurism
I don't think so,at least it isn't true for the majority in my opinion.
Personally, I don't watch porn out of that impulse.

> 3D Porn makes it right there, and they don't get the fantasy of spying.
hmm could be.
though I would suspect that being in the middle of it could add another kick,making it seem more real.

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

Anonymous B replied with this 3.9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post#28,924

I think VR porn would be a more realistic experience than simply 3D, but I've never experienced VR or 3D, so I could be wrong.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3.9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post#28,926

@previous

> I think VR porn would be a more realistic experience than simply 3D, but I've never experienced VR or 3D, so I could be wrong.

yeah, I agree.
take something like the oculus rift and play regular 3d porn on it that is much better than a 3D TV,you won't have ghosting (double images on high contrast edges) and other issues.

interactive VR porn with a game engine could be even better indeed.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3.9 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post#28,978

@previous

> > I think VR porn would be a more realistic experience than simply 3D, but I've never experienced VR or 3D, so I could be wrong.
>
> yeah, I agree.
> take something like the oculus rift and play regular 3d porn on it that is much better than a 3D TV,you won't have ghosting (double images on high contrast edges) and other issues.
>
> interactive VR porn with a game engine could be even better indeed.

Faggot.

Anonymous B replied with this 3.9 years ago, 4 hours later, 3 days after the original post#28,986

Says the homo riding his jailhouse nigger boyfriend while trolling c4c. Keep sucking nigger cock you pathetic sack of ape shit.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3.9 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 days after the original post#28,996

@28,978

> > > I think VR porn would be a more realistic experience than simply 3D, but I've never experienced VR or 3D, so I could be wrong.
> >
> > yeah, I agree.
> > take something like the oculus rift and play regular 3d porn on it that is much better than a 3D TV,you won't have ghosting (double images on high contrast edges) and other issues.
> >
> > interactive VR porn with a game engine could be even better indeed.
>
> Faggot.

retard.
just because you watch porn focusing on cocks and balls doesn't mean the rest of us does.
(I'm OP btw)

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3.9 years ago, 4 weeks later, 1 month after the original post#29,774

no you are not!

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3.8 years ago, 4 days later, 1 month after the original post#30,047

Cp?

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3.8 years ago, 59 minutes later, 1 month after the original post#30,061

@previous

> Cp?

google sasha grey.
Make sure to hide your IP.
There have been people banned for posting shit with her!

In light of recent events it could be though because she's not a tranny...

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 3.8 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 month after the original post#30,088

Under age?

Anonymous H replied with this 3.8 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 month after the original post#30,092

@previous

> Under age?

above average!

Anonymous F replied with this 3.8 years ago, 1 day later, 1 month after the original post#30,249

A and B should get married, and have lots of 3D babies.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 8 months ago, 3.1 years later, 3.2 years after the original post#33,035

On http://best-paidpornsites.com/ you can find a great selection of 3D porn sites.