Notice: Welcome to Chan4Chan. An account has automatically been created and assigned to you. You don't have to register or log in to use the board. Please don't clear your cookies unless you have set a memorable name and password.

Topic: Doctor Who

Anonymous A started this discussion 4.3 years ago #1,955

Who likes? Americans? Brits? Or WTF is this shiz? N who fav Doctor?

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 4.3 years ago, 1 minute later#25,528

My favorite Doctor is #10 David Tennant. ‹3

(Edited 20 seconds later.)

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 4.3 years ago, 4 hours later, 4 hours after the original post#25,535

Jon Pertwee was my favourite. I liked that most of his stories where set on earth too. Tom baker would be my second choice. I think that period between the two had the best episodes out of the whole thing.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 4.3 years ago, 21 hours later, 1 day after the original post#25,570

my favourite doctor would be the doctors daughter (who is IRL the 5th doctors daughter).

she could play doctor with me anytime.

I wonder how a sonic strap-on would feel...hmmmm

(Edited 30 seconds later.)

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 4.3 years ago, 3 weeks later, 3 weeks after the original post#26,203

now im counting number 12 Peter Capaldi

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 4.2 years ago, 3 days later, 4 weeks after the original post#26,248

I used to like Doctor Who. I still like the Big Finish stories. But that fatheaded coalmining poofter shat all over Doctor Who with his simplistic Buffy-lite gay agenda crap. Moffat is better, but he's still trying to make a show targeted at 11-year-old American girls. Pertwee will always be THE Doctor, and nobody after Colin Baker really counts anyway.

Anonymous B replied with this 4.2 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 weeks after the original post#26,253

^ that's pretty much what I think too. I kind of liked a couple of Sylvester McCoy stories but after that its all just Dr Who lite. The only thing I can see to come out of the newer ones is the fact that it remains in the public conscience. Maybe they will start re runs?...

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 4.1 years ago, 1 month later, 2 months after the original post#27,550

re-runs sound cool. i especially like the tom baker ones the best

Anonymous F double-posted this 4.1 years ago, 1 week later, 3 months after the original post#27,787

i know the 50th is soon. cant wait :3

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 4.1 years ago, 9 hours later, 3 months after the original post#27,798

@previous

> i know the 50th is soon. cant wait :3

will they finally show Amy getting gang banged by roman centurions?

or at least the two Amys making out...that would be sweet.

(Edited 39 seconds later.)

Anonymous B replied with this 4.1 years ago, 48 minutes later, 3 months after the original post#27,805

^ or fisting Clara.

Anonymous H replied with this 4.1 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 months after the original post#27,806

@previous

> ^ or fisting Clara.

I'm all for that.

Anonymous B replied with this 4.1 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 months after the original post#27,808

I think to be honest they should drop all the pretence and just get down to it already. It's basically what the companions are there for anyway.

Anonymous H replied with this 4.1 years ago, 19 hours later, 3 months after the original post#27,832

@previous

> I think to be honest they should drop all the pretence and just get down to it already. It's basically what the companions are there for anyway.

yeah, unfortunately they keep that off screen and bore us with what they do between sex...

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 4.1 years ago, 19 hours later, 3 months after the original post#27,870

http://pcdn2.pornex.com/content/03/bb/7a/03bb7a05f903f06c8f550ca6ac8775d8167028/big.jpg

Anonymous B replied with this 4.1 years ago, 11 hours later, 3 months after the original post#27,897

@27,832

> > I think to be honest they should drop all the pretence and just get down to it already. It's basically what the companions are there for anyway.
>
> yeah, unfortunately they keep that off screen and bore us with what they do between sex...

Cruel bastards!!!

Anonymous F replied with this 4.1 years ago, 3 days later, 3 months after the original post#27,991

david tennant said the doctor dosnt seem like the type to have sex

Anonymous H replied with this 4.1 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 months after the original post#27,992

@previous

> david tennant said the doctor dosnt seem like the type to have sex

yeah, that's why his hitchhikers are girls...

Anonymous F replied with this 4.1 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 months after the original post#27,993

@previous

> > david tennant said the doctor dosnt seem like the type to have sex
>
> yeah, that's why his hitchhikers are girls...

and billie piper calls him david ten inch

Anonymous F double-posted this 4.1 years ago, 35 minutes later, 3 months after the original post#27,995

she dumped mickey for the doctor. maybe he wasnt enough

Anonymous H replied with this 4.1 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 months after the original post#27,997

@previous

> she dumped mickey for the doctor. maybe he wasnt enough

well, he has a sonic screwdriver


besides, why do you think he is always surprised after a regeneration about his looks?
he concentrates to do only one thing right.

Anonymous F replied with this 4.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 months after the original post#27,998

@previous

> > she dumped mickey for the doctor. maybe he wasnt enough
>
> well, he has a sonic screwdriver
>
>
> besides, why do you think he is always surprised after a regeneration about his looks?
> he concentrates to do only one thing right.

yep.

screwing chicks througout time and space. but thats prob capt jack harkness's job

Anonymous H replied with this 4.1 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 months after the original post#27,999

@previous

> > > she dumped mickey for the doctor. maybe he wasnt enough
> >
> > well, he has a sonic screwdriver
> >
> >
> > besides, why do you think he is always surprised after a regeneration about his looks?
> > he concentrates to do only one thing right.
>
> yep.
>
> screwing chicks througout time and space. but thats prob capt jack harkness's job

captain jack doesn't have the strictly girls rule the doctor has though.

Anonymous F replied with this 4.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 months after the original post#28,000

@previous

> > > > she dumped mickey for the doctor. maybe he wasnt enough
> > >
> > > well, he has a sonic screwdriver
> > >
> > >
> > > besides, why do you think he is always surprised after a regeneration about his looks?
> > > he concentrates to do only one thing right.
> >
> > yep.
> >
> > screwing chicks througout time and space. but thats prob capt jack harkness's job
>
> captain jack doesn't have the strictly girls rule the doctor has though.

captjackX10 we'll see...

i bet fanfiction.net has that

Anonymous F double-posted this 4.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 months after the original post#28,001

u never know...

Anonymous H replied with this 4.1 years ago, 25 minutes later, 3 months after the original post#28,003

@previous

> u never know...

I believe we've had that already (;

Anonymous H double-posted this 4.1 years ago, 15 minutes later, 3 months after the original post#28,005

@previous

> > u never know...
>
> I believe we've had that already (;

and here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbGyCZxNLJw

Anonymous H triple-posted this 4.1 years ago, 10 hours later, 3 months after the original post#28,021

@previous

> > > u never know...
> >
> > I believe we've had that already (;
>
> and here
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbGyCZxNLJw

check out the inuendo squad clips on youtube from mostly torchwood comic con events with jack.
some of it is quite funny.

sorry, I meant to say faabulouuuus !

Anonymous F replied with this 4.1 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 months after the original post#28,026

one of the best shippings ever. fuck roseX10

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 4.1 years ago, 52 minutes later, 3 months after the original post#28,028

@25,570

> I wonder how a sonic strap-on would feel...hmmmm

Thank you for ruining my childhood! ;-)

Anonymous H replied with this 4.1 years ago, 36 minutes later, 3 months after the original post#28,032

@previous

> > I wonder how a sonic strap-on would feel...hmmmm
>
> Thank you for ruining my childhood! ;-)

the sooner you know about the important things in life boy, the better (;

besides, are you sure that is ruining it?...

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 4.1 years ago, 15 minutes later, 3 months after the original post#28,034

Damn it Jim, I AM Dr. Who, not a furnace.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 2 weeks later, 3 months after the original post#28,308

so now that capaldi is the doctor, will we finally see his companion being assfucked by a "lubricated horsecock"?!

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 2 weeks later, 4 months after the original post#28,842

The problem with Doctor Who(and really the problem with any popular, long-running show) is simple.

The original people who make the original show create characters, concepts etc. that are creative, and popular.

Later, some arrogant dimwitted prick comes along, and takes over. They think that just because they're now in charge of a popular show, it somehow makes them special(well, they are "special", but not in the way they think), and that it is somehow their calling to "explain" and "fix" stuff. Any long-running show will have a few continuity errors and cock-ups along the way. That is natural. But now, some buffoon who had nothing to do with the show's success declares themselves some sort of Show God. So, we get Davies and his cronies writing absolute excrement like "School Reunion" or "Death of the Doctor" or "The End Of Time" to 'explain' stuff, and put their stamp all over the show. Did you know that the Doctor is bisexual, loves niggers, and is 900 years old? Of course you didn't, because none of that is true. However, according to self-declared Expert And Almighty God Of Doctor Who Russell T. Gayvies it is "canon". Davies fucked up Doctor Who. So, Moffat comes along, and suddenly he actually has to write in the whole "Cracks In Time" arc, just to undo SOME of the bullshit that Davies unleashed. Think about that. A whole season-long story arc, just to try and repair some of RTD's crap. This however creates another whole problem, when one cunt fucks something up so bad, the next Showrunner is forced to write stories to try and get the show back to where it was, thereby robbing them of the proper chance to tell proper stories moving forward.

This is reminiscent of when Berman and Braga spent so much time turning Star Trek into an official outlet for their crappy fan fiction. And having boring three-part Enterprise stories, just so they could "explain away" continuity errors that many fans didn't really care about anyway. Okay, maybe have one scene, but three fucking episodes? Eventually, Enterprise became a boring joke. It existed solely for these idiots to push their own pet hypotheses. And so it was canned. This left the next Showrunner with a problem. Sadly, JJ Abrams went for the "let's make it even worse" approach, and basically undid fucking everything. This may not have been that bad, had his Star Trek been any good. But, instead Abrams' "Star Trek" is mindless shit designed to appeal to mentally challenged 8-year-old girls. Abrams' Trek is absolutely fucking abysmal. But here's the thing....Had Berman and Braga not fucked up Trek the way they did, we would never have ended up being subjected to Chris Prick as Kirk , or Gay Spock getting fucked in the ass with a strap-on by Uhura.

And Davies' effect on Doctor Who was worse than what Berman, braga and Abrams have done to Star Trek combined.

So, Moffat's Doctor Who hasn't been wonderful. But think about this....considering the shitload Davies dumped on it, it's a fucking miracle Moffat has produced anything worthwhile at all. And Moffat's Doctor Who was always going to be hindered, because it had to begin where Davies' gay diarrhea left off.

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 6 hours later, 4 months after the original post#28,848

@previous

wow, you're very passionate about your fags.
I have to agree though in many points.
most series become the jerkfest for some retards leeching off of its success, destroying it in the process.
Abrams' Star Trek (we probably should make a separate thread for it) was a stroke of genius for those execs who always hated the original universe with its peace loving hippie attitudes and communist tendencies.
Thanks to Abrams and his predecessors we not only have a fascist, war mongering patriarchy in the federation, we also will be able to vomit ourselves to death when he rekills Star Wars.
Those that survive that pukefest will unfortunately find out their eyes have been permanently damaged by the glaring lensflares.
I hope though we'll finally learn that Darth Vaders breathing originates from the pleasure his strap-on was giving him in that custom made auto erotic suit of his...

Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 3.9 years ago, 4 days later, 4 months after the original post#28,985

@28,308

> so now that capaldi is the doctor, will we finally see his companion being assfucked by a "lubricated horsecock"?!

No. But we will see all the 10 year old girls, and mentally retarded twinks stop watching. Because Capaldi is an older man, and not some mincing little metrosexual queer bait. I am sick and fucking tired of irritating little shits saying that Tennant or Smith is the "best docter eva", and seriously not understanding how people ever watched when guys like Jon Pertwee or William Hartnell were the Doctor.

If you think the Doctor needs to be some young pansy with hair that took 5 hours to style, then you probably shouldn't be watching Doctor Who, as you have no fucking idea why it is as successful as it is. Tennant and Smith didn't make ti successful. They've just ridden the wave. You'd be better off with any of the millions of shit shows and movies that pander to that crap.

Also, if you think that going to Comiccon and dressing up like a Dalek or so-called "Silurian" makes you a Doctor Who fan, you really need to get a fucking clue. That shit has got NOTHING to do with Doctor Who, and if you think it has, you also have no fucking clue what Doctor Who is actually about.

So, queers out, giggling little girls out, cosplay retards out. All of you, stick to Twilight or Harry Potter or fucking Reddit.

Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 3.9 years ago, 6 hours later, 4 months after the original post#29,001

@previous

> > so now that capaldi is the doctor, will we finally see his companion being assfucked by a "lubricated horsecock"?!
>
> No. But we will see all the 10 year old girls, and mentally retarded twinks stop watching. Because Capaldi is an older man, and not some mincing little metrosexual queer bait. I am sick and fucking tired of irritating little shits saying that Tennant or Smith is the "best docter eva", and seriously not understanding how people ever watched when guys like Jon Pertwee or William Hartnell were the Doctor.
>
> If you think the Doctor needs to be some young pansy with hair that took 5 hours to style, then you probably shouldn't be watching Doctor Who, as you have no fucking idea why it is as successful as it is. Tennant and Smith didn't make ti successful. They've just ridden the wave. You'd be better off with any of the millions of shit shows and movies that pander to that crap.
>
> Also, if you think that going to Comiccon and dressing up like a Dalek or so-called "Silurian" makes you a Doctor Who fan, you really need to get a fucking clue. That shit has got NOTHING to do with Doctor Who, and if you think it has, you also have no fucking clue what Doctor Who is actually about.
>
> So, queers out, giggling little girls out, cosplay retards out. All of you, stick to Twilight or Harry Potter or fucking Reddit.

so, what you're saying is, you're into old men.
I personally think it's time for a female doctor.

...wouldn't rule out that horsecock either...

Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 3.9 years ago, 6 hours later, 4 months after the original post#29,006

@previous

> > > so now that capaldi is the doctor, will we finally see his companion being assfucked by a "lubricated horsecock"?!
> >
> > No. But we will see all the 10 year old girls, and mentally retarded twinks stop watching. Because Capaldi is an older man, and not some mincing little metrosexual queer bait. I am sick and fucking tired of irritating little shits saying that Tennant or Smith is the "best docter eva", and seriously not understanding how people ever watched when guys like Jon Pertwee or William Hartnell were the Doctor.
> >
> > If you think the Doctor needs to be some young pansy with hair that took 5 hours to style, then you probably shouldn't be watching Doctor Who, as you have no fucking idea why it is as successful as it is. Tennant and Smith didn't make ti successful. They've just ridden the wave. You'd be better off with any of the millions of shit shows and movies that pander to that crap.
> >
> > Also, if you think that going to Comiccon and dressing up like a Dalek or so-called "Silurian" makes you a Doctor Who fan, you really need to get a fucking clue. That shit has got NOTHING to do with Doctor Who, and if you think it has, you also have no fucking clue what Doctor Who is actually about.
> >
> > So, queers out, giggling little girls out, cosplay retards out. All of you, stick to Twilight or Harry Potter or fucking Reddit.
>
> so, what you're saying is, you're into old men.
> I personally think it's time for a female doctor.
>
> ...wouldn't rule out that horsecock either...

Yeah, that's all this faggot got from reading that.

The point is that older guys can just be guys. Instead of all the queer shit about having some young girly man mincing about. If it's an older guy you don't get all that gay agenda crap. Hopefully.

Also, why do you want a female Doctor? Is that just to be a provocative asshole? If you want that shit, stick to your usual shit, and leave Doctor Who the fuck alone.

Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 3.9 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 months after the original post#29,008

@previous

> > > > so now that capaldi is the doctor, will we finally see his companion being assfucked by a "lubricated horsecock"?!
> > >
> > > No. But we will see all the 10 year old girls, and mentally retarded twinks stop watching. Because Capaldi is an older man, and not some mincing little metrosexual queer bait. I am sick and fucking tired of irritating little shits saying that Tennant or Smith is the "best docter eva", and seriously not understanding how people ever watched when guys like Jon Pertwee or William Hartnell were the Doctor.
> > >
> > > If you think the Doctor needs to be some young pansy with hair that took 5 hours to style, then you probably shouldn't be watching Doctor Who, as you have no fucking idea why it is as successful as it is. Tennant and Smith didn't make ti successful. They've just ridden the wave. You'd be better off with any of the millions of shit shows and movies that pander to that crap.
> > >
> > > Also, if you think that going to Comiccon and dressing up like a Dalek or so-called "Silurian" makes you a Doctor Who fan, you really need to get a fucking clue. That shit has got NOTHING to do with Doctor Who, and if you think it has, you also have no fucking clue what Doctor Who is actually about.
> > >
> > > So, queers out, giggling little girls out, cosplay retards out. All of you, stick to Twilight or Harry Potter or fucking Reddit.
> >
> > so, what you're saying is, you're into old men.
> > I personally think it's time for a female doctor.
> >
> > ...wouldn't rule out that horsecock either...
>
> Yeah, that's all this faggot got from reading that.
you're the gerontophile
>
> The point is that older guys can just be guys. Instead of all the queer shit about having some young girly man mincing about. If it's an older guy you don't get all that gay agenda crap. Hopefully.
>
sure thing alice
> Also, why do you want a female Doctor?
I can fap to that
> Is that just to be a provocative asshole?
provoke a whiny bitch like you? not worth the hassle,it's fun though, I give you that.
> If you want that shit, stick to your usual shit, and leave Doctor Who the fuck alone.
you're sure one obsessed basement dweller.

Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 3.9 years ago, 3 weeks later, 5 months after the original post#29,543

They're still missing a year's adventures.

Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 3.2 years ago, 8 months later, 1.1 year after the original post#32,628

So apparently Clara is now enamoured with some nigger who's killed people. This is actually a trend on Nu Who, and I for one find it disgusting.

First we had Rose a blonde-haired young woman whose boyfriend was spook Mickey. It was later implied that Mickey was a bender, and he was infatuated with a White guy.

When we first meet redhaired Donna she's engaged to a nigger, and it's shown that he's far more intelligent than she is. Later we see Donna's wedding, and it's to another jigaboo.

Negress Martha is a doctor(of course), and is taken with White guys. Meanwhile her father is having an affair with a White woman(who's supposed to be German or Scandinavian). Again, it's shown how the thicklipped nigger is the normal one, and the blonde woman is the joke.

And now Clara is taken with a treeswinging sootie.

Same-race couples are either in bad relationships, or are revealed to be the villains. The one exception was Rory/Amy and that's only because Rory was a complete wimp who allowed his wife to walk all over him. I wouldn't be surprised if she fucks his ass with a strap-on.

The new Doctor Who is all about travelling through space and time promoting miscegenation. Even William Shakespeare was taken with a jungle woman, and we're shown that in the future the Queen of the United Kingdom will be a nignog.

What are others' thoughts on this?Some people say Doctor Who has a GAY agenda. Well, far more than that, it's got a RACE-MIXING agenda. Even the Doctor was flirting outrageously with a boog in only the second episode. Amy and Rory are a rarity in Nu Who, companions who don't fuck niggers. Then again, we found out that their daughter was a fucking pickaninny.

(Edited 39 seconds later.)

Anonymous U joined in and replied with this 3.2 years ago, 23 hours later, 1.1 year after the original post#32,629

^ Really though, when has a TV programme made you want to do something that you would normally be opposed to?

I think what is happening is that the BBC have seen that there is a gap in the market with minorities watching the show and so on an attempt to boost viewing figures in that direction, they are including more black characters. I bet they poll quite high amongst those sectors because of this.

The ex soldier who Clara is about to fuck seems to be a decent sort of chap. He's a luck bastard too on account of her being so fucking nailable.

Anonymous T replied with this 3.2 years ago, 8 hours later, 1.1 year after the original post#32,630

But why do we need niggers in such large amount? There are more niggers per capita on television than there are in real life. And there are more niggers in prominent positions on television than there are in real life. Remember how Moffat had Nefertiti played by a fucking mud monkey?

And even if there are lots of niggers on television, and they are all heroes, have you noticed how all the white women always fall for the niggers? Apparently no white woman can resist a thick-lipped, shit-smelling nignog. Every female companion in Nu Who(excluding Amy) has had to be shown to be fucking niggers. This is not just Doctor Who either, as all television now shows the white woman-nigger male sexual relationship as the norm, and people sleeping with members of their own race as the aberration. Moffat wants to have a nigger hero character, fine. But why does Clara then have to open her legs for this AIDS-infested, smallbrained jigaboo? You can't tell me there's not a deliberate agenda at work here.

Anonymous U replied with this 3.2 years ago, 6 hours later, 1.1 year after the original post#32,631

@previous

> But why do we need niggers in such large amount? There are more niggers per capita on television than there are in real life. And there are more niggers in prominent positions on television than there are in real life. Remember how Moffat had Nefertiti played by a fucking mud monkey?
>
> And even if there are lots of niggers on television, and they are all heroes, have you noticed how all the white women always fall for the niggers? Apparently no white woman can resist a thick-lipped, shit-smelling nignog. Every female companion in Nu Who(excluding Amy) has had to be shown to be fucking niggers. This is not just Doctor Who either, as all television now shows the white woman-nigger male sexual relationship as the norm, and people sleeping with members of their own race as the aberration. Moffat wants to have a nigger hero character, fine. But why does Clara then have to open her legs for this AIDS-infested, smallbrained jigaboo? You can't tell me there's not a deliberate agenda at work here.

I don't deny there is an agenda but I think it is more to do with viewing figures than anything else. I'm not saying that you're wrong, just that I don't think it's as sinister as you say. Tonight she was hero worshiping Robin Hood who was white.

Anonymous T replied with this 3.2 years ago, 1 day later, 1.1 year after the original post#32,632

@previous

> > But why do we need niggers in such large amount? There are more niggers per capita on television than there are in real life. And there are more niggers in prominent positions on television than there are in real life. Remember how Moffat had Nefertiti played by a fucking mud monkey?
> >
> > And even if there are lots of niggers on television, and they are all heroes, have you noticed how all the white women always fall for the niggers? Apparently no white woman can resist a thick-lipped, shit-smelling nignog. Every female companion in Nu Who(excluding Amy) has had to be shown to be fucking niggers. This is not just Doctor Who either, as all television now shows the white woman-nigger male sexual relationship as the norm, and people sleeping with members of their own race as the aberration. Moffat wants to have a nigger hero character, fine. But why does Clara then have to open her legs for this AIDS-infested, smallbrained jigaboo? You can't tell me there's not a deliberate agenda at work here.
>
> I don't deny there is an agenda but I think it is more to do with viewing figures than anything else. I'm not saying that you're wrong, just that I don't think it's as sinister as you say. Tonight she was hero worshiping Robin Hood who was white.

What do you mean by "viewing figures"? Unless a majority of viewers are niggers, then why push niggers so ruthlessly? Most people in the UK, and thus most viewers are White. It's not showing the viewers what they want to see. No, this is the BBC telling the viewers what they should want to be watching. And telling them what their norms should be. It's not reflecting viewers' tastes, it's dictating them.

Anonymous U replied with this 3.2 years ago, 10 hours later, 1.1 year after the original post#32,633

Not sure how you missed my point on that but here goes...

What I mean is that the BBC will have identified a potential market amongst black TV watchers. It will have received market info revealing that blacks aren't identifying with the characters and so are avoiding the show. In order to counter this, the producers will have said that they specifically want more black characters introduced and thus the modern version of Dr Who includes more relevant (to them) characters. I suspect that's why, as whites aren't turning their TV's off when they see a black face, the viewing figures will have increased all being well.

Anonymous T replied with this 3.2 years ago, 10 hours later, 1.1 year after the original post#32,634

You missed my points:

1)There is a higher percentage of blacks on television than there are in the real UK.

2)Blacks are always in respectable and high-profile positions(unlike real life).

3)History has been rewritten so that, eg. Nefertiti was a negress, there was loads of blacks in Elizabethan England...

4)Every white woman finds nigger males irresistible.

5)There is a major major difference between having black characters on a television show.....and what the BBC are doing. Having nigger characters if no big deal, and should be done. Having some of them be heroes, cool. But they are showing a false version of history, and they are also deliberately promoting miscegenation. Again, they're not reflecting the public's tastes, they're dictating how/what the public should act/fee/behave/think/believe.

Having spooks on the show to represent the nigger population is a good idea. Showing a distorted vision of reality is not cool. Promoting the "no white bitch can resist da bruthas" is not good.

Anonymous V joined in and replied with this 3.2 years ago, 3 days later, 1.2 year after the original post#32,635

Time for a scoop, faggots: THERE IS NO AGENDA, except YOURS.
Everything that's not racially segregated disturbs your little racist mental comfort and fantasies.
Blacks & "other races" on TV are just there to keep you buncha retarded masochists revelling in your own narrow-minded butthurt.
Literally, your sorry lot is the pot calling the kettle black.
Newsflash: in spite of everything derpy he's doing and has done, the current US President was actually a major improvement over the previous facepalming retard.

Anonymous T replied with this 3.2 years ago, 23 hours later, 1.2 year after the original post#32,636

@previous

> Time for a scoop, faggots: THERE IS NO AGENDA, except YOURS.
My agenda is resisting the media's agenda. By saying that there is no agenda it makes you either a)a complete fucktard or b)a kike
> Everything that's not racially segregated disturbs your little racist mental comfort and fantasies.
Ooh, the idiot called me 'racist'! Now my whole world is torn apart! Prick. Why do white societies have to be "Racially integrated" while other societies don't? And again, showing some spooks to represent them is one thing. Always promoting the niggers as "better" than other groups, rewriting history to show famous historical figures as niggers, and making every white woman lusting after the niggers IS an agenda.
> Blacks & "other races" on TV are just there to keep you buncha retarded masochists revelling in your own narrow-minded butthurt.
Well, that would be an agenda, tardo. But they ain't just there for that. They're there because the media is trying to undermine white society. And the media is trying to brainwash the kids.
> Literally, your sorry lot is the pot calling the kettle black.
Do you even know what that expression means, fuckhead? And, on the offchance that you actually do know what it really means, would you care to elaborate?
> Newsflash: in spite of everything derpy he's doing and has done, the current US President was actually a major improvement over the previous facepalming retard.
Totally unrelated to anything else in this topic. But Dubya and Obongo have two things in common....1)Neither of them was ever actually legally elected in a fair and open vote and 2)Neither of them wields any actual power. They're both puppets on strings, acceptable television faces who distract retards like you from who is REALLY running the USA.

Anonymous U replied with this 3.2 years ago, 8 hours later, 1.2 year after the original post#32,637

^ Christ, let me guess, is it:
A) Illuminati
B) Jews
C) Monsanto
D) Masons
E) Reptillians

Anonymous T replied with this 3.2 years ago, 7 hours later, 1.2 year after the original post#32,638

@previous

Typical fuckwit trying to drag other shit into something.

It is well-known(among people who aren't complete sheeple) that the kikes wish to undermine western civilisation. A sure way to do that is to make the western peoples lose sight of their own culture, history, heritage and identity. And the kikes use the media to do that. Although I'm pretty sure you're going to claim that the kikes don't control the media....

Anonymous U replied with this 3.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1.2 year after the original post#32,640

And by western culture, do you mean America? I'm pretty sure that most other countries have a fairly typical level of involvement from those of the Jewish faith. The USA is a place where jews seemed to have thrived and as such there will naturally be more in prominent positions. Of course, I'm willing to hear your argument to the contrary.

By the way, parroting the drivel which is spouted by right wing nut jobs and conspiracy theory paranoids is probably more 'sheeple'-like than taking a non biased look at these things and forming an opinion for yourself.

Anonymous T replied with this 3.2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1.2 year after the original post#32,641

@previous

> And by western culture, do you mean America? I'm pretty sure that most other countries have a fairly typical level of involvement from those of the Jewish faith. The USA is a place where jews seemed to have thrived and as such there will naturally be more in prominent positions. Of course, I'm willing to hear your argument to the contrary.
>
> By the way, parroting the drivel which is spouted by right wing nut jobs and conspiracy theory paranoids is probably more 'sheeple'-like than taking a non biased look at these things and forming an opinion for yourself.

You're not even talking about the same thing that I am, moron. And I'm not parroting anything. And how exactly is your promoting the party line "a non biased look at these things and forming an opinion for yourself"?

Anonymous U replied with this 3.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1.2 year after the original post#32,642

@previous

> > And by western culture, do you mean America? I'm pretty sure that most other countries have a fairly typical level of involvement from those of the Jewish faith. The USA is a place where jews seemed to have thrived and as such there will naturally be more in prominent positions. Of course, I'm willing to hear your argument to the contrary.
> >
> > By the way, parroting the drivel which is spouted by right wing nut jobs and conspiracy theory paranoids is probably more 'sheeple'-like than taking a non biased look at these things and forming an opinion for yourself.
>
> You're not even talking about the same thing that I am, moron. And I'm not parroting anything. And how exactly is your promoting the party line "a non biased look at these things and forming an opinion for yourself"?

I'm not promoting any party line. What I have done, however, is had this argument with other sociopaths in the past. From what I have read and experienced, your theory seems flawed.

Instead of getting annoyed that I don't see things the way you do, please elaborate if you are able.
What are you actually claiming?

If was my understanding that you believe that the Jews who you believe control the whole of the western media have some sort of agenda to suppress whites, promote blacks and fragment western culture. Is that correct?

Anonymous T replied with this 3.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1.2 year after the original post#32,643

@previous

> > > And by western culture, do you mean America? I'm pretty sure that most other countries have a fairly typical level of involvement from those of the Jewish faith. The USA is a place where jews seemed to have thrived and as such there will naturally be more in prominent positions. Of course, I'm willing to hear your argument to the contrary.
> > >
> > > By the way, parroting the drivel which is spouted by right wing nut jobs and conspiracy theory paranoids is probably more 'sheeple'-like than taking a non biased look at these things and forming an opinion for yourself.
> >
> > You're not even talking about the same thing that I am, moron. And I'm not parroting anything. And how exactly is your promoting the party line "a non biased look at these things and forming an opinion for yourself"?
>
> I'm not promoting any party line.
Sure thing, Hymie.
> What I have done, however, is had this argument with other sociopaths in the past.
Why am I a sociopath?
> From what I have read and experienced, your theory seems flawed.
Yes, but what exactly is it that you have read? Have you ever tried reading the other side of the story? Do you even know that there is another side of the story?
>
> Instead of getting annoyed that I don't see things the way you do, please elaborate if you are able.
I have elaborated at length, yet you dismissed that as some "conspiracy theory" of a "sociopath"...
> What are you actually claiming?
>
> If was my understanding that you believe that the Jews who you believe control the whole of the western media have some sort of agenda to suppress whites, promote blacks and fragment western culture. Is that correct?

Roughly. The jews control the main media outlets. Certainly television and cinema. The majority of movies and tv shows that people in the west see today are deliberately made to promote the jews' interests. And this includes undermining and distorting white culture and white history. Niggers are shown to be a sort of ideal, and the most desirable men for all white women. White people are shown to be "racist" if they even acknowledge their own culture, but must bend over both forwards and backwards for niggers. This has the direct result of white people being submissive and accepting of others' wishes, while being deathly afraid to assert any views of their own for fearing of being branded as "racist". Famous white historical figures such as Nefertiti and Hannibal are portrayed in these movies and television shows as having been niggers. All white women in these movies and television shows are shown to be utterly unable to resist the nigger males. And the young whites who spend much of their lives watching these movies/tv shows then believe this to be both the norm and the ideal. Anyone who dares to question this is branded a "racist", a "sociopath", a "conspiracy theorist" etc.

Of course, this is all topped off by these same kikes promoting this as somehow being 'progressive', 'liberating' or fighting against closed-minded people. Yes, the people who swallow whatever shit they are served up by The Great God Of The Tube actually claim that they are the enlightened ones, and that the people who actually think for themselves and try to find out other viewpoints are the prejudiced ones following some script!

Anonymous T double-posted this 3.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1.2 year after the original post#32,644

It's not just some "tin hat" "conspiracy theory" by "sociopaths".

Anonymous W joined in and replied with this 3.2 years ago, 6 hours later, 1.2 year after the original post#32,645

I was using the term 'sociopath' in a slightly tongue in cheek way to comment on your distaste for a large section of society.

Ok, so according to IMDB, the top ten TV series of 2014 are as follows:

Outlander
The Strain
The Leftovers
True Detective
BoJack Horseman
Legends
The Last Ship
The Knick
Extant
The 100

Not a single one of them has a main theme as you describe. Eight of them have a strong, white male as the main character, one has a black woman and one has a fucking horse.

Scrolling through the Global 2000 list on Forbes reveals the top three media companies to be:

Comcast
Walt Disney
Twentieth Century Fox

The CEO's of the companies in order are:

Brian L. Roberts
Bob Iger
Tom Rothman

Now admitably, they are all Jewish, or at least of that heritage but as you see, Americas top drama serials do not focus on interracial relationships. Actually, Extant does to a degree, but it involves a black woman and an extraterrestrial force. So, if a conspiracy on the scale that you are talking about existed (One which must presumably include all of those non Jews who work to produce a program) surely we would expect the vast majority of those shows to be actively promoting the agenda.

With that said I propose an experiment. If you consider the people you are are close to, your friends, your family etc, if they watch TV, are probably a good indicator of the general populace. How many amongst them are irresistibly draw to black men as sexual partners? I'm willing to bet that there aren't that many.

Anonymous X joined in and replied with this 3.2 years ago, 2 days later, 1.2 year after the original post#32,646

TL;DR
Faggots.

Anonymous T replied with this 3.2 years ago, 5 days later, 1.2 year after the original post#32,662

@32,645

> I was using the term 'sociopath' in a slightly tongue in cheek way to comment on your distaste for a large section of society.
>
> Ok, so according to IMDB, the top ten TV series of 2014 are as follows:
>
> Outlander
> The Strain
> The Leftovers
> True Detective
> BoJack Horseman
> Legends
> The Last Ship
> The Knick
> Extant
> The 100
>
> Not a single one of them has a main theme as you describe. Eight of them have a strong, white male as the main character, one has a black woman and one has a fucking horse.
>
> Scrolling through the Global 2000 list on Forbes reveals the top three media companies to be:
>
> Comcast
> Walt Disney
> Twentieth Century Fox
>
> The CEO's of the companies in order are:
>
> Brian L. Roberts
> Bob Iger
> Tom Rothman
>
> Now admitably, they are all Jewish, or at least of that heritage but as you see, Americas top drama serials do not focus on interracial relationships. Actually, Extant does to a degree, but it involves a black woman and an extraterrestrial force. So, if a conspiracy on the scale that you are talking about existed (One which must presumably include all of those non Jews who work to produce a program) surely we would expect the vast majority of those shows to be actively promoting the agenda.
>
> With that said I propose an experiment. If you consider the people you are are close to, your friends, your family etc, if they watch TV, are probably a good indicator of the general populace. How many amongst them are irresistibly draw to black men as sexual partners? I'm willing to bet that there aren't that many.

I've never watched any of that gay shit, but there can be no doubt that Moffat's Doctor Who is deliberately promoting race-mixing.

Anonymous Z-1 joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 month later, 1.3 year after the original post#32,700

For those who don't know, that sick fuck Steven Moffat's latest "PC" meddling with Doctor Who is....

The Master is now a woman. Yep, after nearly 50 years of a succession of men playing the character, Moffat has given us a woman in the role. Many sad pieces of shit are violently defending this saying "Just because it's never happened before is no excuse not to do it now". By the same excuse I've never raped and sodomized an underage girl, then killed her and eaten her flesh, but I'm not about to start now just because I've never done it before. So some people said the bisexual Doctor had gone too far, a human woman giving birth to kittens(work it out), the moon is a giant chicken egg laid be a space chicken that is smaller than the egg it laid, reptiles with giant tits, and now the Master comes back as a woman. Eventually you reach the point where you as a fan can simply say "No. I don't recognize this shit as Doctor Who. It's not "canon" or whatever the word the dimwitted kids use is, it doesn't count, it's not part of the same show that gave us Spearhead from Space, Pyramids of Mars and City of Death. It's just very badly written fan fiction that happens to be on the cesspool that the BBC has become today. Thanks, but no thanks. Eccleston, Tennant, Smith, Hurt, Capaldi....NONE of them count. Davies and Moffat are both sick disgusting perverts, and nothing after Paul McGann counts, including his supposed appearance in that minisode Moffat farted out."

Anonymous U replied with this 3 years ago, 1 day later, 1.3 year after the original post#32,701

^ Instead of whining about how much you hate it, why don't you simply watch something else?

Anonymous Z-1 replied with this 3 years ago, 9 hours later, 1.3 year after the original post#32,702

Because it used to be my favourite show. Moffat had nothing whatsoever to do with the creation of the show, the concepts, the ideas etc. It became popular while he was probably still masturbating to tranny porn. Then, this smug idiot takes over, and suddenly he's pushing all his sick fetishes and ideas in the show. It's like watching your grandma that you love becoming senile and incontinent, it's still the same person you loved and still do, and it breaks your heart to see them in that state. Moffat has never created anything original. All he does is push his sick agenda with existing characters like Doctor Who and Sherlock Holmes. and no matter what happens in the future, Moffat's diseased era of Doctor Who will always have happened.

Anonymous U replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 1.3 year after the original post#32,703

Thing is though there have always been changes. Take for instance the Daleks: They used to need an electrified floor to move about on, then in the second film they could fly, then back to the series they could roll around on other surfaces but couldn't get up steps and now they can fly again. It's just the way a scifi series goes. Personally I prefer the older stories despite some shocking ones but I also appreciate what it has become. If I stop liking it I'll just go back to the older ones. It's not a massive deal. Barring that there are always the audio stories that revolve around the past incarnations.

Anonymous Z-1 replied with this 3 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1.3 year after the original post#32,704

@previous

> Thing is though there have always been changes. Take for instance the Daleks: They used to need an electrified floor to move about on, then in the second film they could fly, then back to the series they could roll around on other surfaces but couldn't get up steps and now they can fly again. It's just the way a scifi series goes. Personally I prefer the older stories despite some shocking ones but I also appreciate what it has become. If I stop liking it I'll just go back to the older ones. It's not a massive deal. Barring that there are always the audio stories that revolve around the past incarnations.

You're right there, but there are changing things, and then there's forcing your sicko libtard agenda on people. Originally all the Sontarans were played by one guy, as they were clones. After he died, they got different guys to play the Sontarans, but still made them look very similar. But now Moffat has given us a "comedy" Sontaran. or the Silurians were ancient reptiles who hated mammals. While their look changed over the years, the basics were the same. Now Moffat has given us the idea that Silurians are "homo reptilia"(even a 5-year-old could tell you what's wrong with that), the Silurians look NOTHING like they did, the females have huge plastic tits, and Madame Vastra or whatever she's called in engaged in a lesbian relationship with a human girl. In Victorian London. The Master was played by a succession of men, and while some like Eric Roberts weren't that good, again the basics were always there and constant. By making the Master 'Missy', Moffat has basically rewritten the entire history, background, and identity of the Time Lords to suit his libtard agenda. And it's not just his PC crap. The bit about the moon being a millennia-old egg that was laid by a magic flying giant space chicken, then watching the new magic flying giant space chicken hatch, and lay an identical egg bigger than the magic flying space chicken itself is.....come on that's just fucking stupid. There are other things that Davies started, like having the giant Cyberman in Victorian London, so Moffat has to have a dinosaur in Victorian London. Moffat has the "cracks in time" erasing anything he doesn't like, then has the universe rebooted. This isn't Doctor Who. And this retard has actually written it into the narrative that everything he doesn't like was either removed by the cracks in time, or the reboot, or the Time War. So if you don't like it, well YOUR Doctor Who was erased by the Pen of Moffat.

Anonymous Z-2 joined in and replied with this 2.1 years ago, 10 months later, 2.2 years after the original post#32,914

Well, the new Series 9 has started off rather shittily, hasn't it? The two-parter The Magician's Apprentice/The Wicth's Familiar has been a showcase for nearly everything that is wrong with Steven Moffat and his approach to and version of Doctor Who. And now, the Doctor has made his Death Confession. Whatever could it be? And does anyone really care?

Oh yeah, and here's my thought on the fuckwits at various sites, who claim to be "experts"...

Anonymous Z-2 double-posted this 2.1 years ago, 2 weeks later, 2.3 years after the original post#32,918

More shitty news:

Big Finish Audios was formed in the late 80's during the "Wilderness Years". They got the rights to make audio adventures starring Peter Davison, Colin Baker, Sylvester McCoy and later Paul McGann.

In the days before Davies made new Who television episodes, these audio adventures were the only way to get new adventures starring the actual people who had played the Doctors(and companions). There were also audio stories featuring Sarah Jane Smith, the Daleks, and others.

After the new series started airing, the Big Finish audios continued. And for a couple of years at least, they were the only way for fans who preferred the Classic series to get new stories actually featuring THEIR Doctors.

In retrospect we can see that the turning point was when Gary Russell left, and Nicholas Briggs replaced him as head of the BF who department. Up until Russell left, the idea was about quality. Big Finish would release one Doctor Who audio a month, and average nearly one other(eg. Srah Jane Smith, Gallifrey) a month as well. And every script was written, rewritten etc. to be the best it could be.

Since Briggs took over there have been two main mantras: QUANTITY, and DUMBING DOWN.

This started with the fucking awful New Eighth Doctor Adventures with Sheridan Smith as Lucie Miller. Lots of short, pointless stories. Since then, the quantity has increased...Main Range, Eighth Doctor, Third Doctor, Fourth Doctor, Early Adventures, Lost Stories, Companion Chronicles, Destiny of the Doctors, Short Trips, Special Releases, Bonus Releases, etc. etc. As well as loads of unwanted "spin-offs" like Counter Measures, Jago and Litefoot, Vienna, Graceless, etc. etc.

And Briggs really loves his box sets as well. Originally, Big Finish would release a 2xCD set with over two hours of quality story, and sold for the price of a single CD! NOW, these box sets are less than four hours of story stretched out across 5 CDs(for the price of about 8), and with maybe 20 minutes of actual story ideas in it. I think anyone who has ever sat through a Big Finish Doctor Who box set without wanting it to JUST FUCKING END should be awarded a medal. However, Big Finish are now releasing dozens of these things. As well as Briggs' idea that ONE box set is never enough, so there will always be the announcement of FOUR linked box sets telling a single story! So it's 20 CDs(for the price of about 30-35), and usually with less actual storytelling and creativity than an old 2XCD used to have!

But now, Big Finish have announced/launched even MORE ranges: Doctor Who"The Churchill Years! UNIT:The New Series(with fucking Osgood)! Torchwood! The Diary of River Song! Classic Doctors New Monsters! River Song will be appearing in The Doom Coalition(4 box sets each with 5 CDs!)! And The War Doctor!(4 box sets!) Plus a special prequel to The War Doctor called The Eighth Doctor:The Time War!

Also, Big Finish are now doing Dark Shadows! The Prisoner! The Wizard of Oz! The Avengers! And the same small group of retards are making ALL of these stories!(Therefore there is NO WAY that ANY story can have ANY care or detail on it) And ANOTHER 5-CD box set(!) called The Worlds of Doctor Who ahd characters from different stories interacting, showing how it's all one "universe"!

You know what? FUCK YOU BIG FINISH! FUCK YOU NICHOLAS BRIGGS! You are nothing but Steven Moffat's submissive bottom. I'd much rather have two QUALITY released a month(at affordable prices), than the 15-plus releases you churn out like a junk food restaurant at exorbitant prices. Who even remembers the shitty stories that you put out earlier this year? Yet everyone remembers the Gary Russel-era stories. Do you know why that is? Do you care? or are you only interested in "product", having people just talk shit for an hour, record it, and then slap the Doctor Who logo on it, and charge the price of a small car for it?

It's fitting. Big Finish is now exclusively made for fans of Moffat's shitty television drivel. Yes, people like McGann and Baker may still be making stories, but they have NOTHING to do with Classic Doctor Who, and NOTHING to do with early Big Finish.

Anonymous Z-3 joined in and replied with this 2.1 years ago, 3 days later, 2.3 years after the original post#32,919

Big Finish shut down their Forums. Forever.

Note the timing: right before that slaphead Briggs and his catamite Ian announced that they would be making four War doctor box sets. That way the actual response from fans could be suppressed. Instead we get only the positive comments from the people in their inner circle. This makes it appear that "the fans" actually WANT four mind-numbingly tedious CD box sets starring the "War Doctor".

But here's a fun fact: All original BBC Drama television must contain a self-contained continuity, as per the BBC Charter. By intertwining with the Big Finish ashtrays, sorry audios, this in essence makes the television series Doctor who non-canonical. because you needed to watch a computer only episode to understand part of it, then you need to have sat through the hours and hours of boredom that was Dark Eyes to understand THAT, and now the War Doctor at Big Finish! The Paternoster Imbeciles at Big Finish! River Song at Big Finish! Submissive bottom cuckolds at Big Finish!

Anonymous Z-2 replied with this 1.9 year ago, 1 month later, 2.4 years after the original post#32,925

And now sicko Steven Moffat has given a piece of shit story called 'Hell Bent'. Bent, get it?

The Doctor arrives on Gallifrey, which apparently is a crappy piece of desert. AT THE END OF TIME. He goes to a barn where he eats soup, while a bunch of gormless looking extras look on.

The Time Lords send guards to fetch the Doctor, but none of them do. Eventually Rassilon shows up, but the Doctor tells him to go away, so he does.

The Sisterhood of Karn are also on Gallifrey(how?), and the lead cow gets to insult the Time Lords and the Doctor. Because Bitch Power and all that.

The capper however comes when a MALE Time Lord is shot(by the Doctor! Hey, didn't he hate guns?). The guy starts regenerating, and when he gets up.....he is a FEMALE! Yes, tranny Time Lords! Everyone then just carries on as though this is perfectly ordinary.

On Gallifrey, we see Daleks and Cybermen captured by the Time Lords' "brilliance". Because everything before Moffat took over is crap!

The Doctor then travels to THE END OF TIME(wasn't he already there?) where he runs into Ashildr. Hey, shouldn't Orson pink be there too? And the Toclafane? Ashildr and Clara(not dead) steal a TARDIS, which resembles a diner, and leave. And then the Doctor leaves. The Time lords were able to break through to our universe, but apparently the stupidity of this episode will make them forget that.

This episode's own internal logic FAILS. It was fucking stupid. But we also get to see our real first onscreen tranny regeneration. I'm sure some people will hail this as something special, but it was just stupid, sick, useless shit.

Anonymous Z-4 joined in and replied with this 1.9 year ago, 1 week later, 2.5 years after the original post#32,926

Wherever Moffat leads, Nicholas Briggs will follow like a lapdog.

Unable to resist, Big Finish have released an 'Early Adventure' featuring 'the Second Doctor' called "The Black Hole".

In case you didn't know, Patrick Troughton was the lead in Doctor Who from 1966-1969. Yes, about FIFTY YEARS AGO. Patrick Troughton died in 1987. Nearly THIRTY YEARS AGO. Now...these Big Finish "Early Adventures" are stories made today that are supposed to take place between stories made from 1963-1969. In the case of "The Black Hole"(made and released in 2015), it supposedly happened to the Second Doctor between The Ice Warriors and The Enemy of the World(two stories that were made and aired in 1967). The actual star had been dead for decades. Once nubile young companion Deborah Watling(Victoria Waterfield) is now nearly 70, and sounds(and indeed looks) nothing like she did back then(unsurprisingly). This story "The Black Hole" is written by some smug little prick who wasn't even born until the late 70's(Simon Guerrier).

The story NEVER feels like a Classic story from the Patrick Troughton Era. But then it never really feels like a Doctor Who story at all. That is not unusual for Big Finish Doctor Who stories under Nicholas Briggs, but they HAD to go that extra Moffat step......

A male Time Lord gets shot. He regenerates. And is now a woman! Yes, the tranny Time Lord regeneration is now part of Big Finish as well. And of course, it's not even treated as out of the ordinary by ANYONE. Either in the story, or in the Fuckwit Overload of the "behind the scenes" extras. So apparently, tranny Time Lord regenerations were "normal" for 60's Doctor Who.

Fuck you Simon Guerrier! Fuck you Nicholas Briggs! And Fuck you Big Finish!

Anonymous Z-5 joined in and replied with this 1.8 year ago, 2 weeks later, 2.5 years after the original post#32,927

I love Dr. Who.

Anonymous Z-4 replied with this 1.8 year ago, 17 hours later, 2.5 years after the original post#32,928

@previous

> I love Dr. Who.

I bet you love trannies as well, you sick fuck.

Anonymous Z-5 replied with this 1.8 year ago, 1 week later, 2.5 years after the original post#32,929

A good radio is always important.

Anonymous Z-4 replied with this 1.4 year ago, 4 months later, 2.9 years after the original post#32,961

What the fuck is the deal with the tards at Big Finish Audios having Doofus Hound playing "The Monk"? Who the bloody hell is "The Monk"?! According to Baldy Briggs, "The Monk" is supposed to be the Time Lord character that Peter Butterworth played on television during the William Hartnell Era. However, there's a problem with that...

THAT CHARACTER WASN'T ACTUALLY A MONK AND NEVER REFERRED TO HIMSELF AS BEING CALLED THE MONK, BRIGGS YOU UGLY FUCKING MORON!!!''

As anyone who has actually watched those episodes with Butterworth knows, that character was clearly NOT a monk, did most certainly NOT refer to himself as 'The Monk', and the 'monk' act was a one-off DISGUISE, designed to pull off ONE single scheme. It failed. After which he had no reason to ever dress like a monk again, no reason to ever go near a monastery again, and certainly no reason to ever be referred to by anyone as "the monk"(note the lower-case 'm', Briggs you stupid fucking idiot) ever again.

Why the flying fuck would this character EVER wear a monk's cowl ever again? Why would ANYONE ever refer to him as 'The Monk'(upper-case 'm'? WTF?) ever? And why would there ever ever be ANY reason why the character would call HIMSELF "The Monk"?! Who came up with this bullshit? And who was irresponsible enough to let these fucking imbeciles who wrote this manure out of care homes for the mentally challenged? Or do the retards that write this shit write these Big Finish Audio scripts while sitting drooling in these Homes for the Really Really Fucking Stupid?

Again....

The character played by Peter Butterworth was NOT actually a monk. He was NEVER called 'The Monk' the way that the Doctor is called 'the Doctor' or the Rani is called 'The Rani'. He DOESN'T dress like a monk all the time. That was a ONE-OFF DISGUISE that he ONCE wore for ONE scheme. That failed disastrously. Why the FUCK would he STILL be dressing in a one-off disguise that would make him fucking conspicuous everywhere he goes, especially a one-off disguise that ended in total and utter failure and humiliation? And why the FUCKING HELL would he want to start calling himself 'The Monk', given what happened to him in 1066? It makes NO FUCKING SENSE. It's written by a COMPLETE AND UTTER FUCKING RETARD, who has SHIT FOR BRAINS, and probably struggles to comprehend that Anakin Skywalker and Darth Vader are the same character in Star Wars.

For the last time: There is NO Time Lord in Doctor Who called 'The Monk' or 'The Meddling Monk' or anything with 'Monk' in the name. The character that Peter Butterworth played so superbly in the 1960's IS NOT A MONK, HE WAS NEVER A MONK, HE DOESN'T ORDINARILY DRESS LIKE A MONK, AND HE ISN'T CALLED "THE MONK", OR ANYTHING EVEN REMOTELY LIKE THAT!!!!!!! The one-dimensional fuckwit cipher that Graeme Garden and Rufus Hound played so insipidly and poorly has got NOTHING to do with Peter Butterworth's magnificent wolf in sheep's clothing! Again, THERE IS NO FUCKING TIME LORD CHARACTER WHO WAS EVER CALLED "THE MONK"!!!!!!!!

Nicholas Briggs is a fucking stupid fucking cunt, making non-canonical audio drivel, served up for mentally retarded tweens. And Briggs himself is a thick fucking cunt, who fails to comprehend simple concepts. Can we now look forward to Briggs making audios featuring the return of every name and every disguise of every character that ever appeared in Doctor Who, with thicko fuckwit Briggs thinking that that must make them each their own unique and different character?

Anonymous Z-4 double-posted this 2 months ago, 1.2 year later, 4.1 years after the original post#33,054

Well, the SJWs have their wish!

The "Thirteenth Doctor" will be a woman...Jodie Whittaker!

Note how the BBC are already claiming that the response has been "overwhelmingly positive", with only a few "misogynistic" people complaining, according to the BBC and other media!

That's not the reality on the ground though. The actual response from the public has been far more negative than the "right-on" media would want you to believe.

But the media love to tell people what they think. Like with the atrocious "Missy", Steven Moffat has actually spoken about how "everyone loves her". Which is a complete and utter load of shit.

The media is also falling over itself to promote how "overwhelmingly positive"(they have a handful of phrases that they use over and over) the response latest Capaldi series was. Again, ratings continue to drop off. More and more people are walking away from the show for good. Yeah, but the media says the response was "overwhelmingly positive".

Of course, with the BBC ratings don't matter. Either they lie about them, or they says "Ratings don't mean anything in 2017!"(or whatever year it is). No matter how popular a show is, if the BBC don't like it, they will cancel is. Likewise, no matter how shitty and unpopular a show is, if it ticks all the correct PC boxes, it will keep getting renewed. And probabl pick up a lot of awrds and nominations too.